If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. From January 31, 2017 to around 14:00 to around 17:00, the Defendant: (a) had an article 2,50,00 the victim’s name and non-owned market value of KRW 2.50,00,00 in the victim’s name and non-owned market value, which was planted in the vicinity of Jung-gun C, from around 17:0 to around 250,00.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

2. On March 22, 2017, the Defendant violated the Creation and Management of Forest Resources Act: (a) had an engineer with a cognize with a cognize with the market price of KRW 500,000,000,000 owned by the victim Jeonnam-do, who was in a forest E in Gojin-gun E, from March 2, 2017.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen products from forest.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against the F;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on transaction details and account transaction details;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 73 (1) of the Creation and Management of Forest Resources Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the case where the defendant had a majority of the same criminal records as the defendant, although he/she has a different species of crime, he/she is in the period of suspended execution.

However, the sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, economic environment, etc., shall be comprehensively taken into account in favorable circumstances such as the fact that the market price of the stolen tree is not high and that the expanded tree is restored to its original state, and the punishment of a fine like the order shall be