개별공시지가결정취소
The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the first instance.
A. Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act are cited on the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance (as stated in Section 2 (a) through 6).
The detailed items B (the instant land) No corresponding sound corresponding to C (the instant standard land category): (10,00 square meters in large size 10,917 square meters in size 19,968.7 square meters in size (in the case of forest land) commercial area - commercial area of 1.00 square meters in size - no corresponding sound corresponding to urban planning facilities of 1.00 other restricted district unit planning zones of 1.00 square meters in commercial or land use 1.00 square meters in height 1.00 square meters in height - No corresponding sound corresponding to 0.88m on the surface of a road, which falls under sound corresponding to 0.88m on the surface of a road - from 500m to 1.0,000 square meters in size - from 1.0,604, 200, 3008 square meters in total at the end of the judgment of the court below (the total of KRW 300 to 208,300.8 square meters in size below).
From the fifth bottom of the judgment of the first instance, the third-party is as follows.
From the fifth bottom of the judgment of the first instance to the second to the second half of the first instance is as follows: "The deliberation and resolution was made as appropriate, and in the case of 2018, the deliberation and resolution was made as appropriate without submitting any opinion or objection by the plaintiff)."
On January 1, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking revocation of the determination of the officially assessed individual land price as of January 1, 2016 on the instant land (hereinafter “the officially assessed individual land price in 2016”) and the determination of the officially assessed individual land price as of January 1, 2017 (hereinafter “the officially assessed individual land price in 2017”).
As to the officially assessed individual land price in 2016, the first instance court accepted the plaintiff's claim on April 4, 2019, and revoked the above officially assessed individual land price decision (Seoul District Court 2016Guhap53788), but the defendant is dissatisfied with it.