보험계약 무효확인 등의 소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning the instant case is as follows, and thus, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the part which is used, added, or deleted as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
[Attachment 969,759,515,239,515 [Attachment 2] No. 969,759,515, 200, total insurance money to be paid 89,330,000 No. 192,810,00 of the insurance money to be paid 969,759,517, 515 No. 2 of the first instance judgment after the revision: No. 2615, Sep. 27, 2003; No. 2021, Sep. 26, 2003; No. 377 hospital hospital hospital hospital hospital; No. 2561, Dec. 14, 357; No. 19675, Jul. 15, 207; and 1967.
The first instance judgment deleted the first instance judgment’s 6th 4 and 5, and “the Defendant is unable to submit objective materials proving that the above daily acquisition or C worked in Samsung Electronic from 2002, and subsidized monthly living expenses to the Defendant. Rather, according to the evidence Nos. 8 and 19-1 and 2 of the evidence No. 19-2, the Defendant was receiving government’s basic living expenses at the time of entering into each of the instant insurance contracts with the Plaintiff. The Defendant was receiving government’s basic living expenses at the time of entering into each of the instant insurance contracts with the Plaintiff, and only the fact that C received KRW 1,50,000,000 from C on September 19, 2002 is objectively proven.”