2. The judgment of the Defendant is a favorable condition to the Defendant, such as the confession of all of the instant crimes, the depth of the instant crimes, and the arrest of a number of drug offenders due to the Defendant’s cooperation in the investigation.

However, the crime of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. was committed on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. without being aware of the fact that the defendant merely administered phiphones, purchased a considerable amount of phiphones from others, and again sold, received, or sold them again to many other persons, and possessed phiphones and sculmmm remaining in the attempted crime. The crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act is very poor in light of the type, method, etc. of the crime. The crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act was committed by driving a car without a driver's license and causing danger to the general public for traffic safety while driving the car without a driver's license. The defendant committed the crime of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. while he was sentenced several times for the same crime of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., and the defendant committed the crime of this case again during the repeated crime period without being aware of the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case, the amount of the defendant's character, character, environment, criminal records, family relationship, etc.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.