However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 19, 2015, at around 20:50, the Defendant: (a) worn a fright while drunked on the road of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Eunpyeong-gu, 506-31, and (b) took a bath and fright to a slope C belonging to the B district unit, where he was on duty in the Dob patrol, without any justifiable reason, called “Ye-ma, Egye-Ie-Ie-Ie-Ie-Ie-Ie-Ie-Ie-Ie-Ie-Ie-Ie-Ie-Ie-Ie-Ie-Ie-Ie-Ie-Ie-Ie-Ie-U.

Nevertheless, the Defendant continued in the tin to keep the bath and the cryp of "," etc. and the cryp of the cryp, the public official, and continued to keep the cryp of the above police officer's cryp and the cryp of the cryp of the cryp, and was charged with the cryp of the above police officer's chest as the

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties concerning the prevention of police officers' crimes and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] : (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution; (2) there is no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (limited to a person who has been specially punished); (3) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (limited to a person who has been specially punished) ; and (4) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution ; (4)