If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. The Defendant forged a private document with a view to raising the performance of C’s work, which is an employee of the NA branch in the Seoul Gyeonggi-gu Seoul Southern District Office B in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and with intent to subscribe to the Agricultural Cooperative Property Insurance Co., Ltd. (no) and the Papum Savings Insurance in the name of the Defendant’s child in order to obtain business convenience from C, and around May 24, 2012, the Defendant forged an offer under D’s name, stating that D would pay KRW 50,00 per month insurance premium using a verification color pen without authority for the purpose of exercising it within the above branch office, with the intent to exercise it within the above branch office, (no) stating that D would be D’s payment of insurance premium every 10 years, with the signature of D as D in the contractor and the insured column of the Papum Savings Insurance and the attached documents, and signed by D,

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph (1), submitted a forged offer form to an employee who could not know the name of the NA branch of the said Seoul Gyeonggi-do branch, which was unaware of the forgery, and exercised it as if it were duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement by the police about E (including D's statement);

1. A report on investigation (investigative records, 32-3 pages, 55-56 pages);

1. Application of statutes to a copy of an offer;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;