청구이의
1. The part concerning the counterclaim in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be modified as follows:
Newly Inserted by Presidential Decree No. 2010, Jan. 1, 201>
1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article
On July 19, 2007, the 5th sentence of the judgment of the first instance, "Seoul High Court" in the 19th sentence, "Seoul High Court Decision 2007", shall be applied "Seoul High Court Decision 2007."
Part 8 of the first instance judgment of the first instance court, the "Counterclaim Defendant" in the first instance judgment of the first instance shall be applied to R and Q.
Part 8 of the judgment of the first instance, part 14 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the road packing has been completed" in Part 14 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "2015Na2064542" in Part 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the Seoul High Court 2015Na2064542", is written.
Part 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the term "this court" in Part 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be applied to the Panel Division of the Incheon District Court.
Part 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter referred to as "the dismissal of all appeals") shall be made by adding "the dismissal of all appeals" to "the dismissal of all appeals."
In the 9th judgment of the court of first instance, the 15th judgment "this court" shall be applied to "the first instance court".
The "sken" of the first and second sides of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be written by cutting the "sken" into " concrete".
In the first instance judgment, the part of the judgment of the court of first instance provides that “The offset shall be made against May 26, 2017,” in the first instance judgment, “The offset shall be made by offset against the damages claim of the counter-party against the counter-party under Article 2-2(b) of the conciliation protocol of this case against the damages claim of the counter-party against the counter-party under Article 10, 9 through 11.”
No. 11 of the 11th judgment of the first instance court is written with "no." as well as "the branch line has been installed with R, a prone, a prone of the counterclaim."
In the following cases, the first instance judgment No. 14 of the first instance court’s letter No. 14, “the fact that the first instance court was not infinite,” and “the first instance court determined that the counterclaim Defendant owned the middle line as seen below, and 7 the instant protocol provides that the counterclaim Defendant and the counterclaim may pay damages according to the ratio of KRW 1,00,000 per day in the event of nonperformance, respectively, to the counter Defendant and the counterclaim.”