However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On October 31, 2014, from around November 1, 2014 to around November 1, 2011, the Defendant forged securities: (a) in real estate No. 116 E of Gangnam-gu Seoul, in which the Defendant had been a brokerage assistant, the Defendant copied three copies of the check number of KRW 100,000 in one’s own face of the face value of KRW 100,000 (the check number F, the G, and H) issued in advance at a new bank substitute station (CX9300F), using the ESO complex (CX9300F) installed therein; and (b) recorded the front of the check in its size.

For this purpose, the Defendant forged three copies of a check before the issuance of a new bank, which is a valuable security.

2. At around 16:30 on February 27, 2015, the Defendant, who held a false security event, paid 200,000 won to K (a false name) for the price for sexual traffic at the 2nd floor of “Jel” in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and held each event by inserting two copies of the forged one’s check (i.e., check number F, “G”, and “G”) into a white envelope as if they were actually published.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place stated in the above paragraph 2, had the victim K by deceiving the victim by paying two copies of the check forged as the price for sexual traffic at the same time and place, and had the victim interfered with the victim once and exempted the victim from paying 200,000 won of the price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police in relation to K;

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Investigation reports (as for attaching photographs of the contents of conversations), inquiry into details of transactions, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes on self-checks;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 214(1) (the point of each Article of securities), Articles 217, 214(1) (the point of exercising securities), and 347(1) (the point of fraud) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. The choice of punishment shall be punished by imprisonment;

1. Aggravation concurrent crimes;