beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2014.12.04 2014고단2409

폭행등

Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2.However, the execution of the above imprisonment for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 7, 2014, at around 04:25, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force of about 10 minutes, such as, under the influence of alcohol, the victim C’s “D restaurant” operated in Ansan-si B, Ansan-si, the Defendant: (a) was breading the bottom of the water reservoir, the water reservoir, the contact, etc. on the table, which was on the table table without any particular reason; (b) dricking the disturbance, such as dricking the drick, and making the customer on the table and the chair; and (c) obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force.

2. On June 7, 2014, at around 07:36, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force for about 20 minutes, such as, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant: (a) thrown down the salted fish and the suspension on the floor without any particular reason while drinking; (b) the victim C refrained from doing so; and (c) the victim C expressed that “the victim is the president, she is the president, and she is the president of the width”; and (d) the Defendant is unable to enter the restaurant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

2. The police statement concerning C;

3. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to internal CCTV creation photographs;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the relevant criminal facts;

2. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

3. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

4. Dismissal of prosecution under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The summary of the facts charged was assaulted by the Defendant on the ground that the victim E, who was drinking in the next place of the facts charged as indicated in the judgment, is slick and slick, and on the ground that the victim E, who was drinking in the next place of the crime, was slick.

2. Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act and Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act by submitting a written agreement that the victim does not want to punish the defendant.