실업급여 지급제한 등 처분 취소청구의 소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On February 14, 2015, the Plaintiff retired from employment with B, and the Defendant recognized the eligibility for job-seeking benefits to the Plaintiff on April 17, 2015 pursuant to Article 43 of the Employment Insurance Act (hereinafter “the Employment Insurance Act”); around that time, Article 44(2)3 of the Act and Article 65 subparag. 9 of the former Enforcement Decree of the Employment Insurance Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 27738, Dec. 30, 2016; hereinafter “Enforcement Decree”).
B. After that, the Plaintiff reported to the Defendant that he had made efforts to re-employment via the Internet (hereinafter “re-employment report”) and received the job-seeking benefits totaling KRW 9,976,000 from the Defendant after receiving the recognition of unemployment.
(C) 1. 5: (a) 1. 1. 2. 2. 1: (b) 1. 2. 1; (c) 2. 1. 1; (d) 2. 1. 1. 4. 1; and 3. 5. 2. 1. 2. 1. 0; (d) 2. 1. 1. 2. 1; (e) 1. 1. 2. 1. 3; (e. 2. 1. 1. 1. 2. 1. 4; (e. 2. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 20; (e. 2. 2. 1. 1. 1. 1. 20; (e. 2. 1. 1. 5. 20; and (e) 1. 3. 1. 1. 1. 8. 20. 5. 2015;
C. However, the Plaintiff, who had been staying in a foreign country, had his/her child in Korea using the Plaintiff’s authorized certificate, made his/her child in the name of the Plaintiff via the Internet.
The defendant shall have the results of follow-up investigations by the Board of Audit and Inspection.
In order to find out the same facts as the paragraph late and to receive job-seeking benefits according to the report of efforts for second and third re-employment.