위증
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The lower court found the Defendant not guilty of the facts charged on the ground that the testimony of this case is consistent with the truth, on the grounds that the testimony of this case is deemed to conform to the truth, unless the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the case involving murdering, attempted murdering, etc. against the Gunsan Branch of the Jeonju District Court 2017 High Court Gohap 153 B, and that the testimony of this case is not to display
However, the defendant consistently made a statement that B was prone to the improvement in the investigative agency. This is consistent with the contents of the CCTV image, witness's report, and the medical certificate, and thus the above legal testimony is a perjury. Therefore, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant, is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts.
2. The judgment of the court below is difficult to view that ① if a male male Eul has displayed a compromise with the intent of killing the defendant, (i) the upper part of the defendant's actual wife is much more severe than that of the defendant; (ii) the upper part of the defendant's body is not found; and (iii) the upper part of the defendant's body, other than the son's face; and (iv) the upper part of the defendant's body, shape, and degree of the buckbuck, etc. with the defendant cannot be considered as be be be a beererer, and the upper part of the defendant's body, other than the son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son and son's son's son's son.