Defendant

A was dismissed from office as the representative of the Dong apartment in the Gangnam-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, and it is the E's spouse, the tenant of D apartment public facilities, and the defendant B is the resident of the 112 Dong.

On November 2, 2012, the council of occupants' representatives of victim D Apartments case filed a child-care center ordering lawsuit against E on November 2, 2012, and won the case at the trial on June 11, 2013. In order to inform the apartment residents of the progress of such a name lawsuit, the council of occupants' representatives attached a notice on the apartment public bulletin board.

1. Defendant A

A. On November 19, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime of November 19, 2013, at around 05:10, the Defendant maintained its utility in a way that he arbitrarily removed the notice of “the progress of a child-care center litigation” owned by the victim D Apartment, which is attached on the public bulletin board of the said elevator, from the elevator with the victim D Apartment 113 1-2 Ra.

B. On December 22, 2013, the Defendant committed the crime of December 22, 2013, at around 17:26, 2013, at an elevator with the above apartment 109 Dong 1-2 Ra, the Defendant maintained its utility by arbitrarily removing the notice “the report on the progress of the lawsuit for the name of the child care center” owned by the council of occupants’ representatives of the victim D Apartments, which was attached to the above elevator public bulletin board.

2. Defendant B, around November 16, 2013, at around 04:59, at the elevator with the above D Apartment 112 Dong 112-2, Defendant B, who was attached to the public bulletin board of the above elevator, lost its utility by arbitrarily removing the notice “the progress report on the child care center” owned by the council of occupants’ representatives, which was attached to the public bulletin board of the above elevator.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Investigation reports (the office's currency);

1. Records of council of occupants' representatives;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Articles 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crimes;

1. Defendant A who is to suspend the sentence: Fine of 500,000 won: fine of 300,000 won;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2)1 of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;