(a) The reasons for the claim are as shown in the annexed sheet;

(However, the “creditor” and “debtor” are deemed to be the “Defendant”. (B)

On October 6, 2020, the Plaintiff changed to seek a return of unjust enrichment of the insurance money corresponding to the date of hospitalization, which exceeded the reasonable number of hospitalization days, to the effect that the Defendant received hospitalized treatment and received the amount of insurance money equivalent to the cost of hospitalization from the Plaintiff, even though the Defendant did not need hospital treatment on the premise that the insurance contract remains effective, on the grounds of the claim stated in the complaint seeking the invalidity of the insurance contract and the return of unjust enrichment accordingly.

2. Judgment by service (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).