beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.01.12 2016고단8607

업무방해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defluence;

A. On July 8, 2016, around 15:20, the Defendant’s insultd the Victim B, before the “E” store operated by D on the first floor of the Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul building C, the Defendant was reported and sent to 112, and was trying to prevent the Defendant from committing any disturbance, and the assistant B and the policeman affiliated with the Seoul Hyeung Police Station Facing Police Station Facing the Defendant, three surrounding merchants and commercial management personnel, and the store customers, and the Defendant’s slope B was considered to be the victim slope B.

1.3.3. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 2. 2. 1.

“Publicly insulting the victim by referring to “,” etc.

B. On July 9, 2016, the Defendant insultd the victim D on July 11:38, 2016, in front of the victim D’s “E” store operated by Jongno-gu Seoul building 1, Jongno-gu Seoul, Seoul, on the ground that the victim D was not submitted a written application for the withdrawal of the Defendant. However, among many merchants viewing, the Defendant attempted to drive away from the victim D with the application for the withdrawal of the Defendant.

The president shall be equally dismissed.

The victim openly insultingd the victim by openly obsesing about 15 minutes of pulse, such as “The Amarar Ba.”

2. On July 9, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 11:00 on July 9, 2016, on the ground that the Defendant was receiving a written application for withdrawal from the Defendant from the C commercial prosperity conference due to the Defendant’s continuous interference with the Defendant’s continuous interference with the business; (b) on the ground that the Defendant was receiving a written application for withdrawal from the Defendant from the C commercial prosperity conference; and (c) whether the Defendant “

When he was aged, he was able to see his age and was able to see a large amount of 30 minutes of age, etc., by force, thereby interfering with the functions of the store operation of the victim by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made against H, D, or B;

1. Application of each statute on filing of a complaint;

1. The corresponding criminal provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts of crime; and

참조조문