A. The sentence against the Defendants (Defendant A: imprisonment with prison labor for 1 year, confiscation, Defendant B: imprisonment with prison labor for 10 months, confiscation) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

B. The above sentence against the Defendants by the prosecutor of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The grounds for appeal of this case by the Defendants and prosecutor are as follows: health team; the Defendants reflects the Defendants’ fault in depth; the period of participation in the crime of this case is relatively short; the first offender who has no record of criminal punishment in Korea; Defendant A was in the case of Defendant A and the victim did not want to be punished against the Defendant; and the so-called “Singinging” fraud case led to the crime of this case in collusion with other accomplices in China. The so-called “Singing” fraud case led to the crime of this case in large and highly likely to cause social criticism; the Defendants actively participated in the role of withdrawing cash in the crime of this case; other unfavorable circumstances such as the Defendants’ age, character, environment, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime of this case. In full view of all the various sentencing conditions revealed in the argument of this case, the Defendants’ punishment against the Defendants is too heavy or unreasonable. Thus, the Defendants’ assertion and prosecutor’s aforementioned grounds are without merit.

3. In conclusion, since all appeals filed by the Defendants and the prosecutor are without merit, they are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.