A. Defendant A, around 11:00 on April 29, 2015, at around 11:00, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim F, who was at work, with the victim F, in front of the E golf club guard room located in the EM club, against the company, by saying, “If the victim f, who was a staff member of the EM club, had a defect in holding a meeting to withdraw unfair dismissal, she shall be sexually insulting the victim, the victim, who was a police officer, “if the victim f, who was a staff member of the FF in the future, died of his or her life, she was flick, she was flud, and he or she shall do so.”

B. Defendant B, at the same time and at the same place as above, when there are police officers and labor union members as seen in the above paragraph 1, the Defendant openly insultingd the victim by referring to the victim as “F’s feasible feas, feasible feas, feas, so, now now, he did not have a feasible conscience. If he does not want to do so, she would have to do so, she would have to do so if she would have to do so, she would have to do so, she would have to do so, she would have to do so, she would have to do so, she would have to her human life, she will have to do so, she will have to do so, she will have to do so, and she will have to do so.

C. Defendant C, at the same time, at the same time, and at the same place as above, and there were police officers and police officers, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by saying, “The Defendant was fluored with glusiums and glusiums and glusiums and glusiums and glusiums and glusiums and glusiums were only glusiums and glusiums and glusiums, and publicly insulting the victim.”

2. The above facts charged against the Defendants are all crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only upon the victim’s complaint pursuant to Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act.

However, this part of the prosecution can be dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the victim's withdrawal of the complaint against the defendant after the indictment.