2. In full view of the fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and against his mistake, even though it is recognized that the amount of damage in this case was not significant, the Defendant did not pay damages to the Defendant, and the Defendant did not receive a letter from the victim, the Defendant had the history of having been punished by a fine for the same kind of crime, and other various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and background of the crime, means and consequence, and the circumstances after the sentence of the lower judgment, and new circumstances or changes in circumstances that are likely to be reflected in sentencing after the sentence of the lower judgment, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.