When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 15:00 on September 20, 2018, the Defendant: (a) found sobried to Daehan’s work at the construction site of the building in which the victim was employed; and (b) obstructed the victim’s operation of the victim’s KRW 40 minutes on the ground that the victim was unable to receive adequate wages by having performed a work at the construction site of the building in which the victim was constructed, but did not receive adequate wages, such as the problems with the construction company, etc.; (c) whether the victim was in bad faith and the completion of the construction is proper; (d) the construction company should not only leave the building; and (e) the construction company should not take all parts of the building; and (e) the Defendant interfered with the victim’s operation of the victim’s KRW 40 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of 112 Treatment Table Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;