However, as to the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On June 27, 2013, from around 01:00 to around 01:40 of the same day, the Defendants: (a) requested payment of the drinking value from the injured party D in the Jinhae-gu Erash room operated by the victim D; (b) Defendant A: (c) expressed that “I would not have any drinking value; (d) she would have her fingered, she would have her fingered, she would have her talked with a large voice; and (e) she had the entrance of the door twice, she had her fingerd, her fingerd, her fingerd, her fingerd, with a large voice; and (e) Defendant B her fladddd, “I have no money, she will write off. I have her flabed, she would have her mouthed, her door 40 minutes of the entrance; and (e) customers could not enter the door.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly interfered with the victim's entertainment bar business by force.

2. At around 01:40 of the date mentioned in the above Paragraph (1), the Defendants were asked questions from the slope G, a police officer belonging to the F police box called up after receiving the above Category D’s report, to ask questions about the developments leading up to the failure to pay the alcohol value and personal information, and Defendant A refused to answer the answer, and Defendant B assaulted, such as: (a) Defendant A assaulted Company A to interfere with the performance of the performance of the performance of the performance of the performance of the performance of the official duties, and was arrested as an offender in the act of committing a crime of the performance of the performance of the official duties; (b) Defendant B committed an assault by assaulting Company A, thereby preventing the use of G’s arms, putting him in drinking, and putting him in drinking.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly interfered with the legitimate execution of public duties concerning the protection of the lives, bodies and property of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to D and G

1. Articles 314(1) and 30 (a) of the Criminal Act, Articles 136(1) and 30 (a) of the Criminal Act, Articles 136(1) and 30 (a public offering to interfere with the performance of official duties) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor

1. Defendants among concurrent crimes: each of the Defendants.