2. The defendant is the plaintiff A, 7,991,650 won and the plaintiff.

(a) Project approval and public notice - Project name: D Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”): The public notice of E on September 22, 2014; E on August 17, 2015; the public notice of E on September 22, 2014; the Defendant:

B. The ruling of expropriation by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal on October 12, 2015 - Persons subject to expropriation: It is as indicated in the column for “subject to expropriation” in the attached Table.

(Individual Land shall be specified only as lot number): - The commencement date of expropriation: November 26, 2015 - Compensation for losses: as shown in the column for "amount of compensation for expropriation" in the attached Table.

- An appraisal corporation: a virtual appraisal corporation, one appraisal corporation, and a vice governor of an appraisal corporation (hereinafter referred to as “appraisal of expropriation”)

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on February 26, 2016 and on September 29, 2016 - Details of the ruling - The amount of compensation for objection stated in the attached Table “amount of compensation for objection” is as stated in the attached Table.

- An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation and a dialogue appraisal corporation (hereinafter referred to as “appraisal of adjudication”)

D. Results of the entrustment of appraisal to appraiser G and the results of the entrustment of appraisal supplementation by October 24, 2016 - Contents of appraisal: The same shall apply to the statement in the column of “amount of compensation for expert appraisal” in attached Form 1.

However, with respect to H land (area 83 square meters) owned by Plaintiff B, it was assessed as “a religious site,” which is a land category at the time of the initial appraisal, on the premise that the use status of 39.7 square meters out of the above land area is a road by means of a supplementary appraisal on October 24, 2016.

(hereinafter referred to as “court appraisal” in total of the initial appraisal and supplementary appraisal by an appraiser / [based for recognition] without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Gap evidence 1, 2, and 3, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 4, 5 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 6, and 9, the result of the court’s entrustment of appraisal by an appraiser G, the result of the court’s entrustment of appraisal by an appraiser G, and the purport of the whole pleadings;

2. The plaintiffs' assertion

A. The category of land A, J, and K owned by Plaintiff A1 is “the answer.”