2. Although the Defendant committed the instant crime even though he had been sentenced to a fine of KRW 500,00 in 209, a fine of KRW 700,000 in 2010, and KRW 700,000 in 2012 due to the fraud by using the Internet direct trade site, the Defendant committed the instant crime for three times against many unspecified victims. The instant crime also committed the instant crime for four months, and not agreed with the victim E (amount of KRW 150,000). However, all these circumstances were considered in the lower court; the Defendant recognized the Defendant’s mistake and reflects it; the Defendant did not have any record of the suspension of execution; the sum of the damages caused by the instant crime was limited to KRW 50,00 in total; the victim D (amount of KRW 195,00 in total); the F (amount of KRW 160,000 in total); the Defendant’s injury amount was not subject to punishment, and the Defendant’s circumstances and circumstances leading to the Defendant’s occupation and behavior.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.