If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Around 23:30 on October 24, 2012, the Defendant returned to each Dong unit in Yangsan-si, and the occupant dismissed the E Management Director on the ground that the E-Management Director had committed sexual indecent act against the denial at the latest in his singing room and the head of E-management office in April 2012, the Defendant was ordered to pay wages ( approximately KRW 2,00,00) from the Gyeongnam Regional Labor Relations Commission after April 2012, and immediately receive an order to restore the status of the former tenant president D's representative director D's position of the chairman who had been illegally exercising the event was resigned on July 17, 2012, and our apartment was placed in the place where the former E-Management Director should pay KRW 20,000 won as the management expenses of the occupants at the singing room, thereby publicly pointing out the fact that the E-Management Office had committed an indecent act against the victim at the latest by publicly pointing out the fact that it was an indecent act against the victim (A43).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Entics;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes on Report of Investigation (Listening to Statements of Suspects);

1. Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the argument is that the defendant distributed the above inducements for the benefit of the whole occupants of the apartment complex, so the defendant's act does not constitute an act for the public interest.

2. Even if the subject or overall purport of the above-mentioned inducement satisfies the right to know of apartment residents with respect to public matters, the part concerning the above victim among the contents of the inducement is not about public interest, but about the wholeme of the inducement.