When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

【2016 High Court 3037】

1. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act is the owner of B rocketing vehicles.

No person shall operate any vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance.

Nevertheless, at around 13:50 on July 30, 2016, the Defendant operated the said vehicle, the distance of about 200 meters from 13 to 200 meters from the Simam-dong in the same Simam-dong from the Kumam-dong apartment, which is located in the Simam-dong in the Simam-dong.

2. On July 30, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act: (a) around 13:50 on the 30th day of July 30, 2016, driving the rocketing B rocketing vehicles, and driving the three-lane roads of the 13rd parallel, which are located in the Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si; and (b) along the three-lane roads, the Defendant was facing the said three-lane roads from the Sejong High School

In such cases, a driver has a duty of care to safely check the front and rear left and right well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to drive the victim C (48 taxes, South) who was driving in front of the direction of the process and the vehicle number and the type of the vehicle are considered to be a simple clerical error. Therefore, the vehicle number and the type of the vehicle recognized by evidence are corrected to the vehicle type and the vehicle type. After the driver's seat of the vehicle, the Defendant shocked the front part of the driver's vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant damaged the victim's driver's vehicle by occupational negligence above to require approximately KRW 1,158,00 for repair costs.

【Court Decision 2016 3038】

3. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act is the owner of B rocketing vehicles.

On August 15, 2016, the Defendant operated the said vehicle, which was not mandatory insurance on the front road of the apartment complex, as the Osan City Arboretums Arboretums, around 09:35, 577-15, which was located in the village of the remaining bridge.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment Nos. 1 and 2] 【2016 High Court Decision 3037】

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Protocols and field photographs of the police statement C;

1. Written estimate of the damaged vehicle;

1. A person to whom the case is to be raised;