전부금
1. The Defendants jointly do so to the Plaintiff (Appointeds) A, KRW 11,90,887, and KRW 35,073,751, and the Appointeds D.
1. The cause of the instant claim is identical to the entry of the cause of the instant claim, and it can be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in the entry of the evidence Nos. 1 through 4, and there is no reflective evidence.
Therefore, Defendant B is liable to pay the amount corresponding to each of the pertinent orders entered in the order to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties jointly with the total amount, and to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from March 27, 2015, following the delivery day of the copy of the complaint in this case, Articles 3 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, Articles 1 and 2(1) of the Addenda of the Regulations on Special Cases Concerning Legal Interest Rate in Article 3(1) of the former Act, Article 3(1) main sentence of the former Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings (amended by Presidential Decree No. 26553, Sep. 25, 2015). < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 26553, Oct. 1, 2015>
2. The Defendants asserted that the determination of the Defendants’ assertion was made to the effect that Defendant B’s participation in the business start-up of one person, who was executed by Defendant B as the N representative, was not constituted tort since both the Plaintiffs and Defendant B served to deliver local sales to the head office. However, this cannot be accepted as being contrary to the facts of recognition under the above 1.
3. If so, the plaintiff (appointed party)'s claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.