A. Each of the designated parties listed in the list of the Plaintiffs (Appointeds) and the annexed persons (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Plaintiffs, etc.”; individually referred to as “Plaintiffs” and “designated persons”) are members of the “D Research Council” as an organization that conducts research on the increase of income through rice and barley cultivation; Defendant B’s incorporated association (hereinafter “Defendant B”) is an incorporated association under the Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries established to study measures for the promotion of local residents’ income by utilizing natural resources, etc. in farming, fishing, and mountain villages; Defendant C is a person who is disadvantageous to the Secretary-General of Defendant C as the vice-chairperson.

B. On December 20, 201, the D Research Council concluded an agreement with Defendant C on the test and large-scale cultivation of rice and a seed supply agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement,” and the “instant agreement”) with Defendant C as a party to a contract, and deposited KRW 167,062,50,000, which was created by the Plaintiff’s 2,738,000 by investing the designated parties in each of the 2,738,000 won and the 167,062,50 won in the account of Defendant C as the seed price. < Amended by Act No. 11137, Dec. 30, 2011>

C. Meanwhile, the instant contract and the account under the name of the Defendant Student Association were forged or opened by stealing the seal impression of the Defendant Student Association without obtaining authorization from the Defendant Student Association, and Defendant C voluntarily withdrawn the seed price.

Since then, the Plaintiff et al. failed to receive seeds by May 4, 2012, which is the deadline for supplying seeds, notified the Defendant Student Association of his intention to terminate the instant contract on May 7, 2012.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 5, and 22, the plaintiff (appointed party)'s personal examination result, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff et al. to determine the primary claim against the defendant academic council is the legitimate representative of the defendant academic council, and even if not, Article 126 of the Civil Code is applicable.