If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On June 12, 2008, the Defendant applied for a workplace credit loan to the victim (owner) D operated by the representative director C in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

However, even if the defendant received a credit loan from the workplace, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the loan.

The defendant obtained a loan of KRW 2,977,00 from the victim (the state)D and acquired it by means of not repaying the principal and interest.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the schedule of ordinary deposit transactions;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;