2. The defendants led to the crime of this case according to the co-defendant A's co-defendants in the court below's judgment. Defendant B seems to have caused the defendants to commit the crime of this case. All the defendants did not have any record of having been punished for property crimes, and Defendant C did not have any record of having been punished by imprisonment without prison labor or more. Meanwhile, the crime of this case is not good for the crime to be committed in collusion with the defendants to identify information on another person's credit card and withdraw cash after forging the credit card. In the above crime, Defendant C was only limited to Defendant B, upon request of Kwikkset Service in the process of the crime. Defendant B stored information on the credit card through Kwikset Service, and Defendant B did not have any degree of participation in the crime of this case by providing it to A, and Defendant C did not have any record of the crime of this case's age and character at least 60,000, and Defendant C's assertion that there was no excessive amount of damage due to the crime of this case's crime of this case.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.