정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The facts charged [Attachment to the charge] The Defendant purchased the vehicle from the victim to the middle-class seller of the second-class seller at the time of boarding the house in New Zealand to the middle-class buyer who was accommodated in the home park operated by the victim B. In the process, the Defendant became aware of the fact that the victim received USD 500 from the middle-class seller, and the victim demanded the victim to return it to the victim on the ground that the fact that the victim received the introduction fee was illegal.
【Criminal Facts】
From February 7, 2019 to October 10 of the same month, the Defendant repeatedly sent text messages that cause fears and apprehensions over several times, as indicated in the attached crime sight table, using the Defendant’s cell phone (C) from the money located in the Dongdong-gu to the Defendant’s cell phone (D).
2. Determination
(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Articles 74 (1) 3 and 44-7 (1) 3 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc.;
(b) A crime of non-compliance with an intention: Article 74 (2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc.
C. On August 20, 2020, after the prosecution of this case, a written application for non-prosecution of the victim was submitted.
(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;