However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 7, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million by the Daejeon District Court for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

At around 17:40 on July 4, 2020, the Defendant driven an E rocketing car with the blood alcohol concentration of about 0.174% in the 7km section from the front of the cafeteria, Seo-gu, Daejeon to the front of the same Gu, while under the influence of alcohol level of about 7km.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the control results of drinking driving, and report on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver;

1. Report prior to judgment: Application of second-class Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records, reply reports on criminal records, and summary orders of the same criminal records;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Although there is a career of drinking driving twice the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, this is ten years or more, it is against the fact that it is drinking, drinking, drinking, and other conditions of sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act that are shown in the records of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the following factors: