beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.06.23 2017고단866

자동차관리법위반등

Text

The punishment of the accused shall be determined by ten months of imprisonment.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 23, 2017, the Defendant violated the Automobile Management Act: (a) in the Defendant’s residence located in Seo-gu B Housing B B (105) in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu; (b) was kept in custody due to the nonperformance of this tax; and (c) was unable to operate a vehicle due to the failure of this tax; (c) subsequently, the Defendant forged C identification number plates using a flexible title to operate the vehicle; (d) on March 16, 2017, by attaching a forged number plate on the above Spo-gu 166-day vehicle until it is discovered to the police officer at the front of the 42 internal distance of Mapo-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si; and (e) on March 16, 2017.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act is the owner’s interest of CSpo-Spo-si Spo-si Spo-si Spo-si Spo-si owner, and the owner of a vehicle is prohibited from operating a vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance on the road.

A. On January 31, 2015, the Defendant, who operated a car free insurance contract for C SP car, operated the said C SP car that was not covered by mandatory insurance before F located in the Northern-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu.

From that time until March 16, 2017, the Defendant operated the said C SP car, which was not covered by mandatory insurance, such as the first set of attached Table 1 of the List of Offenses.

B. On February 21, 2013, the Defendant operated the said D vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance at 3 A in front of the Seocho-gu Seocho-gu Seocho-gu Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on February 21, 2013, around 23:45, the Defendant operated the said D vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance.

From that time until December 2, 2014, the Defendant operated the said D vehicle, which was not covered by mandatory insurance, as shown in Table 2 of the Crimes List 15 below.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Details of each motor vehicle registration register, inquiries into the ledger of motor vehicle registration, details of operation of each non-life insurance policy, and details of each mandatory insurance contract;

1. Scenic photographs of crackdowns;

1. Application of seizure records and statutes concerning the list of seizure;

1. Article 78 subparagraph 2 of the relevant Act and Article 71 (1) of the Automobile Management Act (registration number plate) concerning facts constituting an offense and Articles 78 subparagraph 2 and 71 (1);