2. The court below's punishment against the defendant is too unreasonable, taking into account the following factors: (a) the defendant led to the confession and reflect of the crime of this case; (b) the repayment of some of the embezzled money to the defendant; (c) the defendant did not have the same criminal record and has no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine; (d) the crime of this case was committed in light of the circumstances and the details of the crime of this case; (c) the period of the crime of this case or the amount of the embezzlement was not significant; and (d) the damage was not recovered to the trial; and (e) the defendant was not agreed with the victim; and other various sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, such as the defendant's age and happiness environment;

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.