However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 11, 2014, the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol in the taxi at 810, the taxi engineer was under the influence of alcohol in 810 at the south-gu at the port, Nam-gu; (b) and (c) when the Defendant heard the horses from the slope D belonging to the Kannam Police Station C Zone C District of the Posi Police Station called “whether the purpose land is” who was called out, the Defendant she was sent to the taxi engineer at the request of the taxi engineer at the request of the taxi engineer; and (d) said D, “I am off after I am, I am?? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am on the right side of the mobile phone driver’s report to identify the mobile phone.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (related to attaching a copy of a working place), an investigation report (referring to a statement hearing report by a blind person);

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 136 (Selection of Imprisonment or Imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] No person who has no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (decision of sentence] (decision of sentence] Defendant is a primary offender; Defendant confessions of the instant crime and reflects his mistake in depth; Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance leading to the instant crime; circumstances after the instant crime, etc., shall be determined as per Disposition in consideration of the following factors.