교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal history] On May 22, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year by the Seoul Western District Court to imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, a violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-licenseed driving), a violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-licenseed driving), and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-licenseed driving). On June 20, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-licenseed driving), a violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-licenseed driving), and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-licenseed driving) and 13 times more
[Criminal facts]
1. On April 11, 2018, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) driving B B B B spack trucks around 01:15, and, at the same time, the Defendant started driving on the front line of the apartment at the 3-lane 16th line located in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Busan, Seo-gu, Seoyang-gu, in order to promote the games, with the two-lanes of the local lower-level road.
At the time, there is a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving an automobile driving employee by complying with the signal, keeping the front right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right are accurately operated.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, while driving a blood alcohol concentration of 0.095% under the influence of alcohol while neglecting the duty of 0.095%, neglected to do so, and entering the intersection and making a left turn to the left at the ebbbb of mountain, despite the fact that the crossing signal at the ebbb is red, according to the two-lanes of the ebb and the ebbbb, he received the front front portion of the Defendant’s freight truck.
As a result, the Defendant suffered injury, such as salt, tension, etc., in need of approximately two weeks of treatment by occupational negligence, to the victim.
2. Although the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) was twice or more times the driving force of drinking as above, the Defendant sent a match at the time specified in paragraph 1.