beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.01.18 2016나246

건물명도

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this case is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance.

The following changes shall be made from 14th to 16th of the decision of the first instance.

The plaintiff, around the other hand, terminated the above lease contract by serving a copy of the complaint of this case on the ground that the defendant did not pay part of the lease deposit under the lease contract of this case, and as a preliminary one, the defendant did not pay rent for November and December 2015, the above lease contract is terminated by serving a written application for change of the cause of the claim of June 15, 2016.

The 18th of the judgment of the first instance court shall be changed to the 3rd of the judgment of the first instance, "illegal gains".

The decision of the first instance court 4 pages 3 of the decision, "The obligation to pay rent has been fulfilled," which is later added.

The 5th 10th 10th 10th 10th 1th 5th 1th 5th 1th 1th 2th 2th 2th 2th 3th 2th 3th 5th 2th 2th 1st 2th 2th 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 3

2. The decision of the first instance court is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.