However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person working as a branch office at the Incheon branch office in Bupyeong-gu, Incheon from around 2014 to around 2016, and the victim D (41 tax) is an employee of around March 2006 and worked at the above branch office at the above time.

1. The Defendant, on May 2014, was assaulted by a police officer on May 2, 2014 from around 09:00 to around 10:00, while receiving a report on the business loss from the injured party at the office of the pertinent branch office Incheon Metropolitan City Co., Ltd.’s office, on the ground that the injured party failed to properly adjust the business loss, he/she “in contact water” to the victim.

Chewing strings, shrings,” and assaulted the victim's head by using the hand floor at one time.

2. On September 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed assaulting a police officer from around 09:00 to around 12:00 on September 2015, 2015, on the ground that the victim, at the same place as paragraph (1), was deemed to have suffered a business loss; (b) stated that “the victim was able to do so; (c) he was able to do so; (d) he was able to do so; and (d) the victim was boomed twice by drinking the victim’s fright while walking the part of the fright and walking the part of the fright.

3. Around June 2016, the Defendant, at around 15:00 on June 2016, 2016, expressed that, on the ground that the victimized person was unable to settle his/her business loss, he/she assaulted the victim that “it has not yet been resolved until now, she shall do so, she shall do so.” The Defendant expressed that he/she was unable to resolve his/her business loss, and assaulted twice the victim’s chest on the part of his/her head on two occasions with his/her hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Although it does not reach an agreement with the victim on the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the defendant himself.