A. The following facts are acknowledged by the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8 and all pleadings, and contrary to this, it is difficult to believe that Eul evidence No. 1-1, 2, and 3 are stated.

1) On February 17, 2015, the Plaintiff, an insurance company, with Defendant and the insured as B, signed an insurance contract listed in attached Table 1 (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).

In conclusion, the relevant terms and conditions of the instant insurance contract are as follows. Article 17 (Obligation to Notify before the contract) The contractor or the insured are aware of the matters asked to question in the subscription form at the time of subscription (hereinafter “Obligation to notify before the contract”), and are the same as “Duty to notify” under the Commercial Act.

Article 18 (Obligation to Notify after the Contract for Accident Insurance) (1) In the event that the insured changes his occupation or duties or continuously uses a two-wheeled motor vehicle or motor bicycle during the period of insurance, the contractor or the insured shall notify the company without delay. Article 19 (Effect of Violation of Obligation to Notify) (1) The company may terminate this contract regardless of the occurrence of damages, in any of the following cases:

2. After entering into a contract prescribed in Article 18(1) with respect to a significant increase in risk, B, upon entering into the instant insurance contract, submitted to the Plaintiff the obligation to notify the contractor or the insured intentionally or by gross negligence. B, upon entering into the instant contract, indicate “Iskn't't't't't" as “Isk't't". B, as shown in attached Table 2(2), around April 23:30, 2015, as shown in attached Table 2.