When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 09:30 on March 24, 2014, the Defendant prevented the Defendant from carrying dump trucks with the dump truck in such a way that the victim (ju) F site manager G (year 47) who was awarded a contract with the audience “E improvement projects” (year 47) under the contract with the audience for the “E improvement projects” used cump truck and dump truck in order to park the hump truck before the defect hump truck in order to put the dump truck into the dump truck in a way that it does not turn off.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's official business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. A witness G or J's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on accident site photographs;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of a selective fine (such as the background leading to the instant crime, the progress of the instant crime, and the details of the Defendant’s cooperation in the process, and the fact that the Defendant had no criminal record)

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.