A. Within seven days from the date the instant judgment became final and conclusive, on the top of the initial screen of the C press site (D).

A. The Plaintiff is the president of the E Foundation, a public institution affiliated with the Cultural Heritage Administration, and the Defendant is a press organization operating online newspaper C press (D).

B. On September 17, 2018, the Defendant published the same article as attached Form 2 (hereinafter “instant article”) to the effect that the Plaintiff, who violated the past Public Officials Act, as the Plaintiff elected in the president of the Foundation, committed the same unlawful act continuously as the president of the Foundation, and that the Plaintiff, who was in violation of the former Public Officials Act, as the Plaintiff elected in the president of the Foundation, falsely entered or misrepresented the academic background and career in the process of election of the president, was the title “F” on the Internet Press website operated by the Defendant.

[Ground for recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1

2. Whether any false information is reported.

A. The following facts can be acknowledged in light of the purport of the entire pleadings in each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 6, 11, 15-1, 2, and 16.

1) The article of this case states as follows: “AC which only contributed on five occasions to a specific person at the time when he held the Office of Arts of the Foundation G (2014-2015) and violated the Public Officials Act as the president of the H Foundation.” The article of this case states as follows: “The matter of academic background is “the completion of the department of folklore at I major graduate school,” but the records of IF are written as “the completion of the department of folklore at IF,” and it is false that the academic background is recorded as “the completion of the department of folklore at IF,” and the records of IFF are recorded as “the non-registered class of the three-year term of study, and this is also false.” Meanwhile, the article of this case is written as follows: “The answer on the subject of academic background as described in attached Table 2,” and the article of this case is written as the Plaintiff’s academic background at the graduate school.

(b).