1. As to the defendant's case, the defendant and the person requesting an attachment order (hereinafter "defendant") appealed against the defendant's case from the judgment below. However, the appeal does not indicate the grounds for appeal and the reasons for appeal do not indicate the grounds for appeal.

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court and the first instance court with respect to the claim for attachment order, the lower court, on the grounds stated in its reasoning, has the risk of recidivism and recidivism of sexual crime against the Defendant.

Therefore, it is just to order the attachment of an electronic tracking device for a period of ten years, and there is no error as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.