2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The Plaintiff Company’s claim 1 against D is a processing company for fiber yarns, and from January 2015, the Plaintiff Company entered into an annual insurance contract with D, which operated the textile company with the trade name of E, and performed the annual insurance contract entrusted by D, and requested the original consignment. The Plaintiff Company requested D to pay the payment order for KRW 19,611,820 of the original consignment sales amount and KRW 50,786,567 of the annual sales amount and KRW 50,787 of the annual sales amount, and KRW 20% of the annual payment order from the day following the delivery of the original original copy of the payment order to the day of full payment. The above payment order (Seoul District Court Decision 2015Hu2966 of the Seoul District Court) was finalized.

3) Accordingly, D repaid the Plaintiff Company KRW 17,00,000 to the amount of KRW 17,000,000, and the amount of the Plaintiff Company’s credit to D was KRW 48,398,387. (B) Plaintiff B’s credit against D was the amount of KRW 13,04,000,00,00,000, whichever was paid to D.

2) Accordingly, Plaintiff B’s balance of the annual processing costs of Plaintiff B became KRW 5,048,404. C. D concluded a sales contract on May 26, 2015, under which the Defendant and the Defendant would separately pay value-added tax (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) with respect to real estate, F 203 square meters, which is the only property between the real estate and F 203 square meters (hereinafter “instant real estate”), as indicated in the separate list, and machinery and appliances within which the Defendant would have completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the instant real estate on the same day.

At the time, the defendant was supplied with D, and around March 24, 2015, set up a right to collateral security of KRW 200 million from D with the maximum debt amount.