On October 1, 1996, the Plaintiff completed the marriage report with C on October 1, 1996, and had 1 South and North kys (196 birth, 197).

B. C was diagnosed on December 5, 2013 on the two sides and scopical base in need of a 14-day medical treatment.

C. The Plaintiff filed a complaint against C and the Defendant as a crime of adultery, and C and the Defendant received a decision not to prosecute the Defendant on April 22, 2014.

(No. 9404) of the District Prosecutors' Office within the District Prosecutors' Office, 2014;

A. The Defendant asserted that the Plaintiff’s assertion was unlawful relationship, including the Plaintiff’s wife C and text messages, from August 2013 to December 2013.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay 30,000,000 won to the plaintiff as consolation money.

B. The Defendant’s assertion that he had been working in the Internet car page in the Dong-dong, and had only 6 times since the beginning of June 2013, as other members in the carpet group, and did not have any unlawful relation with the Plaintiff.

As the Plaintiff suspected of suspicioning C, the Plaintiff forced C to make a long time, and had C write down several forms of statements as desired by the Plaintiff, and C made a false statement or a false statement as if the Defendant was an unlawful person.

On December 3, 2013, the Plaintiff threatened C with the confession of the adultery and assaulted C, and C suffered bodily injury, such as the two sides of the two sides, which eventually led to the occurrence of injury.

3. Determination

(a) The “illegal conduct” of the spouse is a wider concept including the adultery, and even not yet reached the adultery, all unlawful conduct that is not faithful to the husband’s duty of mutual assistance is included therein, and whether it is an unlawful conduct should be assessed in consideration of the degree and circumstances of the specific case.

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 87Meu5, May 26, 1987). As to the instant case, the Health Unit is the same.