beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2018.08.22 2016가단123479

소유권이전등기

Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant E owns each share of 18/30 of the land listed in the separate sheet No. 1, and Defendant C, D, and F own 4/30 of the same land, and Defendant G owns the land listed in the separate sheet No. 2.

B. The plaintiff A is the above.

As each land described in subsection (a), the registration of ownership transfer is completed on the land adjacent to the land set forth in Clause (b), on the ground of sale as of November 24, 1998, and on land I as of December 7, 1999, on the ground of sale as of October 1, 1998. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 16510, Dec. 7, 1999>

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence No. 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiffs' assertion and determination plaintiffs asserted that they occupied (a) and (b) of the lands listed in attached Tables 1 and 2, and each part of the lands listed in the attached Tables 1 and 2, and the above H, I's neighboring land owned by the plaintiff, and the above H, I's back land through sunrise or sunrise with their intent to own for twenty (20) years, and seek implementation of the procedure for the registration of transfer of ownership based on the completion of the prescription period

It is insufficient to recognize that the plaintiffs occupied the above (a) and (b) parts of the land for 20 years only with the descriptions or images of Gap's 3 through 6 (including the number of branch numbers). Since there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, the plaintiffs' assertion is without merit.

3. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.