However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 22:50 on May 4, 2019, the Defendant heard the Defendant’s statement that he does not want to handle the instant case from the Defendant’s wife who was at the site of Daejeon Dong Police Station D District E, which called the Defendant’s wife, under the influence of alcohol to “C” in the Dong-gu Daejeon, Daejeon, Dong-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, with the Defendant’s movement on May 4, 2019, the Defendant tried to interfere with the Defendant’s performance of duties, such as: (a) shacking away from his house; and (b) hacking the Defendant with the Defendant’s desire to act in the face of the E face of the Dong-gu, Daejeon; (c) shacking the body of the E on several occasions; and (d) hacking the Defendant with the Defendant’s body by assaulting the head of the Dong-gu, Daejeon police station; and (d) hacking the Defendant’s body with the Defendant’s body; and (c) hacking the Defendant’s body.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements (E, F);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Grounds for aggravated punishment for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act: Requests for severe punishment for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties committed against police officers, such as restitution of damage, and request for punishment for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties committed against him/her. Grounds for mitigation: Confession, medical treatment of and necessity for the principal offense, dependants, etc.