However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Around January 8, 2013, the defendant was present at the court of Incheon District Court No. 322 located in the Nam-gu Incheon District Court of Law No. 322, the above court of Law No. 2012 high-level 3904C as a witness of the defendant's obstruction of business in the above court of Law No. 322, which is the Jung-gu Incheon District Court of Law No. 15:30, Jan. 8, 2013, and the defendant responded to the question, "I see that the defendant intended to adjust and cultivate the land with permission from E, the owner of the land of this case," and the witness responded to the question, "I would like to know how the tenant of the land of this case became aware of the above permission granted to the defendant," and "I would like to answer to the question," that "I will continue to receive the ownership of the land of this case from the prosecutor."

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Witnesses D and E's respective legal statements;

1. Each protocol of examination of the witness to the defendant and E;

1. Application of lease contract, 2012 High Court Decision 3904 decided statutes; and

1. Relevant Article 152(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (it shall be taken into account the fact that there is no other force to punish any person, other than twice previous convictions, and that there