2. The judgment of the court below contains a majority of the records that the defendant was punished for the same and different types of crimes by including three identical sentences of punishment. The defendant committed a serious injury to the victim living together on the left side of the victim by assaulting one time on the ground that the defendant was locked, and the defendant committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime. However, although the defendant was found to have committed the crime of this case, it is recognized that the defendant recognized the crime of this case, and the defendant committed the crime of this case in depth. The crime of this case seems to have committed the crime of this case by unbrupting or contingently. Since the crime of this case is related to the concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act with the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a deadly weapons, injury to deadly weapons, etc.) in the judgment of the court below, the equity should be considered at the same time, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, etc., it cannot be judged unreasonable and unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.