변호사법위반
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.
Punishment of the crime
On February 2, 2012, the Defendant was charged with violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Fraud), etc. of Specific Crimes (Fraud) at the meeting of the Yancheon Prison, which was located in the 790 B, and was in custody in the above prison, and received a request from C, D, E, and F to make the victims of the above violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Fraud) so that they can make a settlement with the victims of the above violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Fraud) by selling the land owned by B, which was in custody in the above prison, and tried to mediate the settlement between B and the above victims
Defendant for the same year
8. Around 20, 20,000 won out of the purchase price of the above land to the above D, 570,000 won to the above E, 300,000 won to the above F, and 300,000 won to the above C as agreed money, and around October 20 of the same year, the loan was made as collateral from the Gyeyang-gu Y land in Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, to the above C, and around October 22 of the same year, 50,000 won out of the loan was paid to the above C as agreed money, and 20,000 won was paid to each of the above victims to the above F as agreed money, and then the settlement was mediated between B and the above victims after obtaining an agreement from each of the above victims.
The Defendant, from October 12 to October 30 of the same month, received KRW 25 million from the above wife of B, I, and J, his father, to the account of K’s National Bank in the name of the Defendant’s child, under the pretext of raising funds for the settlement mediation. From April 2012 to October 20, 2012, the Defendant received KRW 20 million from the above C in the name of raising funds for the settlement mediation.
Accordingly, the defendant, not attorneys-at-law, dealt with legal affairs on reconciliation.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement by the prosecution against C;
1. Protocol of the Police Statement concerning B 1.