beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.08.18 2014고단5197

사행행위등규제및처벌특례법위반

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B's imprisonment of 8 months, Defendant C's imprisonment of 8 months and Defendant D's imprisonment of 8 months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person operating a game room under the trade name of "J Gameland" in Busan Jung-gu I, and Defendant B is a general manager of the above game room, Defendant C is a person in charge of internal management of the game room with employees of the game room, Defendant D is a person in charge of internal management of the game room, and Defendant D is a person in charge of managing customers entering the outside of the game room and viewing a network of control

Defendant

A from March 2014, 2014 to the beginning of the same year.

6. From the date of November 11, 07:30 to the above J Gameland, the said J Gameland installed 20 outdoor game machines, 60 large-scale game machines, and 20 high-water game machines, and provided them for customers to find out.

The game products as above are game products with 10,000 won per annum provided to customers with an opportunity of 20,000 won per annum and 20,000 won per 10,000 won per 10,000 won per 10,000 won per 4,000 won per 1,000 won per 1,000 won per 1,000 won per 1,000 won per 1,000 won per 1,000 won per 1,000 won per

Defendant

B The same year from March 20, 2014

6. From November 11, 07:30 to the above game room employees, the game room employees were managed, and the game room was opened for customers by contact with Defendant D with no electricity.

Defendant

C The same year from May 10, 2014 to the same year

6. From November 11, 07:30 to the above game room, the game room puts up a book, which is a gift in the game machine, and plays a role to contact customers.

Defendant

D from June 7, 2014 to 07:30 of the same month from June 11, 2014, at the lower parking lot of the above game room, contact Defendant B with the possession of electricity and entry of Defendant B, and see the network in preparation for the police enforcement.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to engage in speculative acts by using the above speculative machine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police officer with respect to K and L.