If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The Defendant uses the name of “B” and is a person who conducts the duties of the Chairperson “C”, and D is a director of the above “C”, and the name of the office and the name of the passbook account, etc.

The Defendant, in collusion with D on January 20, 2010, concluded that “C” offices located in Dong-gu, Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-si, would give the victim F with a false statement that “F will undertake the construction of b0 million won among the Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-si H development works implemented in the Seoul-si G group.”

However, in fact, the defendant and D did not have the intention or ability to provide the victim with the above timbering construction.

The Defendant and D received 1.8 million won from the victim, i.e., one million won to 1.8 million won cashier's checks, and 2.8 million won in cash from the victim, and received 2.8 million won in the account in D's name, such as receiving the remainder of 1.8 million won in the account in D's name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution (including D and the replacement part of the accused);

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant (including D and the replacement part of the suspect);

1. A copy of each protocol of police statement made to F and I, one copy of the contract;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;