When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 2, 2019, at around 23:40, the Defendant: (a) opened the back 20,000 won of the Plaintiff’s Dopo-si Dopo-si, which is operating the victim C58 on the front side of the Gumi-si B apartment road; (b) heard the victim’s demand to request for reimbursement of KRW 20,00,00 of the expenses of the car; and (c) expressed the victim’s desire to remove his/her own discussion; (d) he/she heard the horse, “I do not have parents,” and “I do not have parents,” and the victim’s Dopo-si Dopo-si Dopo-si Dopo-si Dopo-si Dopo-si Dopo-si Dopo-si Dopo-si Dopo-si Dopo-si Dopo-si Dopo-si; (c) however, the facts charged are stated as follows. However, since basic facts are recognized as having no disadvantage in the Defendant’s defense right.

The victim was faced with his head debt beyond the floor and was able to take care of the victim's face and head.

As a result, the defendant puts the victim with 14 days' multipleloptyl type NOS, tensions and tensions of the climatics, and salted climatics and tensions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C and E;

1. The defendant asserts that he did not have the intention of injury (in addition to photographs, etc.), investigation report (C injury diagnosis report) (the defendant did not have the intention of injury). According to the above adopted evidence, it can be acknowledged that the defendant suffered the injury of the victim, such as the victim's flabing, flabing, flabing, flading, and flading flabing, etc. in the process. In full view of these facts, the defendant had the intention of injury to the defendant at the time of the above crime, and therefore, this part

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;