However, for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive against the Defendants.

1. Defendants A are the actual operators of E who performed the replacement work of the electric storage circuit project in Gangwon-si Co., Ltd., Ltd., which is located in Gangwon-si, and Defendant B is the business owner who received the above construction work from the above A.

With respect to workers engaged in work at a place where an object falls or is likely to fall, or where a height or depth is likely to fall, the business owner shall pay safety belts, safety shocks to workers engaged in work at a place where an object is at least two meters high or depth is likely to fall, and safety belts shall be applied to workers engaged in work at least the number of workers engaged in safety work; and when handling heavy objects, he/she shall conduct a prior investigation into the topography, ground area, and ground level, etc. of the workplace in order to prevent the danger of workers, and record and keep the results thereof; after considering the results of the investigation, he/she shall prepare a work plan including safety measures to prevent the collapse of the downway, and when conducting work by assembling the mobile vision, he/she shall have the duty of care to prevent accidents to workers due to the fall, such as the fall between the two sides.

Nevertheless, the Defendants, at around 10:30 on November 21, 2016, neglected to do so at the site of the foregoing construction, had the victim F (hereinafter referred to as 48 years of age) perform dismantling work which handles the electric air conditioners, which are heavy objects, for a long time at the top of the mobile-type vision, and did not prepare a work plan, and did not pay safety caps, safety belts, safety belts, and safety shoes, and the safety risks are not installed at the top of the mobile-type vision. Thus, the victim was the victim who was at the top of the mobile-type vision.